AN Flight Photos and

AN/AP Flight Comparisons

This first group of tests shown are OLDER formulations

Formulation 62% PSAN Blend C (baked)
20% 1000 mesh Mg
18% (87%Binder + 13%Mondur Curative)
Case, etc. Homemade aluminum re-loadable case with same dimensions as Aerotech RMS 38/480.  Paper liner, paper casting core.
Number of Grains 4
Bore Diameter 0.375"
Propellant Outer Diameter 1.274"
Grain Length 1.8"
Nozzle Throat 0.203125"  = 13/64"
Estimated Max Pressure 783 psi
Estimated Total Impulse 379 NS  (The Aerotech I-161W has a total impulse of about 350 NS)
notes: useable

Quick pressurization to full thrust.

Full scale 100 psi corresponds to 82 lb thrust.

38_480 PSAN flt 2.jpg (9161 bytes)

TEST 11: OPTIMIZED REGRESSIVE MOTOR -  Quickly reaching 41 lb peak

motor_11c.gif (13055 bytes)

The first flight of a motor identical to the one in test 11 caused a 5 lb rocket to drift away under chute at significant altitude.  That rocket was recovered 1 year later. A subsequent flight of a motor identical to the one in test 11 on a 6 lb extended LOC EZI-65 produced an altitude of 1438 ft.  As expected due to the higher total impulse and longer burn, the PSAN flight was 215 ft higher than the I-161 flight with the same rocket despite identical propellant weight.   The old PSAN re-load was slower than normal to ignite. This was apparent in the AltAcc data capture and in the slow lift-off.

My apologies on the photo left:  The top 1/3 of the rocket was out of frame and was pasted from another photo of the same rocket for asthetics.  However, all of the photo from 2" above blue altimeter compartment on down is from the second flight of the PSAN re-load mentioned above..

 

The AltAcc data captures of the left and right flights are superimposed below.  The brown is the faster I-161 quickly reaching a higher speed and a lower altitude on lower total impulse. EZI65 extended 38_480 composite.gif (22631 bytes)


ANAP_comparison.jpg (28074 bytes)

 

A slightly higher metal AN formulation was used below.


Nov, 2001 SkyDance

62% PSAN Blend C (milled for slightly smaller particle size, then baked)
21% 1000 mesh Mg
  1% 400 mesh Al
    
(Note: Without Ammonium Perchlorate, aluminum slows the burn rate.  If you add
     aluminum, it is better to use 2 micron Al instead of larger Al like this 400 mesh.
     Even larger Al drastically slows the burn rate - especially if 2% or more is used.)

16% (87%Binder + 13%Mondur Curative)


Same size case as Aerotech RMS 38/480 with phenolic liner and paper casting tubes.

sd30cb1.jpg (103383 bytes) sd30cb2.jpg (36229 bytes)

6 lb rocket
(pictures courtesy of Tom Montemayor)


Similar results were obtained with 54mm motors.  However; unlike the 38mm motors, further calculations were necessary for the 54mm comparisons because the propellant amounts differed somewhat for the 54mm motors.  Flown on a J415 with 1.456 lb APCP and 2 C6's for tracking the test vehicle, an AAMRAM, turned in an altitude of 4400 ft. The same vehicle flew to 5411 ft with larger heavier motor casing containing 1.664 lb of AN propellant an additional beeper and .5 lb of tracking chalk.   Another AN flight with 1.66 lb of propellant launched in this vehicle from a lower altitude in more moderate weather (others were hot) resulted in an altitude of 5260 ft with only one C6 and the same additional weight.


Nov , 2001 SkyDance 30

Formulation 62% PSAN Blend C (milled for slightly smaller particle size, then baked)
21% 1000 mesh Mg
  1% 400 mesh Al
    
(Note: Without Ammonium Perchlorate, aluminum slows the burn rate.  If you add aluminum, it is better to use 2 micron Al instead of larger Al like this 400 mesh.  Even larger Al drastically slows the burn rate - especially if more than 2% is used.)
16% (87%Binder + 13%Mondur Curative)
Case, etc. Same size case as Aerotech RMS 54/1706 with phenolic liner and paper casting tubes.
Number of Grains 5
Bore Diameter 0.5"
Propellant Outer Diameter 1.75"
Grain Length 2.6875"
Nozzle Throat 0.3359"

sd30mp1.jpg (90488 bytes)
Marlin Philyaw and his wife Maggie preparing his
AAMRAM for launch on our AN motor.
(picture courtesy of Tom Montemayor)

sd30mp2.jpg (80779 bytes)

 

Pay particular attention to the pressure-up on the video below.
  As you can see, it occurs much faster than most people are used to seeing in ANCP motors

sd30mp3s.jpg (8893 bytes)
Movie of AAMRAM flight to 5260 ft
(video courtesy of Tom Montemayor)
2.8 meg

All the flights shown ABOVE are based on OLD FORMULATIONS.


More recent ANCP flights included a 4" rocket flown to over 13,000 ft with
the newer enhanced burn rate ANCP in an L motor casing. 

Below are some flights with the newer enhanced formulation.
There is a significant difference in thrust.

ENHANCED ANCP FORMULATION

 Binder R45-HT 13.17%
 Facile 1 2.40%
 Silicone Oil (1 drop/kg of propellant)
 Al 2 micron (no larger) 1.00%
 Mg 1000 mesh 20.40%
 copper oxide black 0.50%
 PSAN baked milled 55.00%
 AP 35 to 90 micron 5.00%
 castor oil 0.50%
 tepanol 0.30%
 curative Mondur MR 1.74%

 

This 38mm enhanced ANCP motor in a
3" rocket didn't hang around for long!

 

Enhanced ANCP cluster in 7 1/2" x 11 ft rocket with similar markings.

 

 

 


AN vs AP comparison